TLT implied volatility is average right now. ATM IV is 9% and TLT's IV rank is 47, meaning implied vol is higher than it has been on 47% of days over the past year. Options on TLT are priced around their own average.
Implied volatility is the options market's estimate of how much TLT will move, annualised. On its own the number is close to meaningless — that is why "TLT IV is 9%" answers nothing until you know whether 9% is normal for TLT. That is what IV rank fixes: at 47, IV rank 47 is mid-range for this name.
Practically: TLT premium is priced around its own average, so IV is neither the edge nor the obstacle here. Structure the trade around your directional read and the levels rather than around volatility.
The chain is pricing a 1-sigma move of ±0.5% (±$0.38) into the nearest expiry — meaning roughly a two-in-three chance TLT finishes inside that band. That is the number to compare your target against: if your thesis needs less than the expected move, the options are already paying for it, and if it needs substantially more, you are buying a low-probability outcome regardless of how cheap the contract looks.
One thing most IV screens miss: dealer positioning. TLT is currently in negative dealer gamma, which means hedging flow is amplifying realised movement, so realised vol can outrun what implied is charging. That combination is the one where long premium tends to work. See TLT's full gamma map →
TLT's IV rank is 47, so implied volatility is average — higher than on 47% of the last year's sessions. ATM IV is 9%.
There is no universal number, and that is the whole problem with the question. 40% IV is cheap on a high-beta name and expensive on a consumer staple. The comparison that works is IV rank: 0 means today's IV is the lowest of the past year, 100 the highest. Above 60 is generally treated as rich, below 30 as cheap — TLT is at 47.
Implied volatility is the annualised move the option's price implies, backed out of the market price rather than calculated from history. It is a price, not a forecast: high IV means options are expensive, low IV means they are cheap. It says nothing about direction.
It is solved for, not computed directly. You take the option's actual market price and reverse-engineer the volatility input that a pricing model (Black-Scholes for European options, a binomial model for American ones) would need in order to output that price. There's no closed-form solution, so it's found numerically by iteration. ATM IV — the figure above — uses the at-the-money contract in the nearest expiry, which is the most liquid and the least distorted by skew.
No — it means the market is charging as if it will. High IV frequently precedes a large move, but it also frequently reflects an event premium that collapses the moment the event passes, which is why buying options into earnings can lose money on a correct directional call. Compare implied against realised movement rather than trusting either alone.
IV is the raw number (9% for TLT). IV rank puts it in context by asking where that number sits inside the same ticker's own 52-week range. IV alone can't be compared between tickers; IV rank can.
The flip, walls and max pain before the open — free. No card required.
Also see the structure side: TLT gamma map → · TLT implied vs actual earnings move →
This is the free read. Premium members get the daily SPY gamma drop — the map turned into a scenario-by-scenario plan — plus the live conviction desk and the AI copilot.
ATM IV and expected move estimated from the live options chain (Polygon); IV rank from Unusual Whales. Implied volatility moves intraday · educational, not financial advice · options carry substantial risk of loss.
