← AlgoxFlow
People screenshot my chart and ask what all the lines and clouds are. So here's the whole setup in one place — the three EMAs, the Auto Closest FVG with BPR, the BT Cloud, RSI Tops & Bottoms, and the volume heatmap. None of them are a magic button. Each one answers one question, and the edge is in how they stack up to agree before I take a trade.
The 100/200/250 EMAs tell me the trend and give a dynamic support band. The BT Cloud is a faster trend-and-momentum flip on top of that. The Auto FVG + BPR marks the zone — an untraded gap price wants to fill. RSI flags exhaustion and divergence. The volume heatmap shows where real size traded. Trend + zone + momentum + volume all pointing the same way is the trade; when they disagree, I sit out.
Three exponential moving averages — the average closing price over the last 100, 200 and 250 candles, weighted toward the most recent bars so they react faster than a simple average. On the chart the 100 is gold, the 200 is light blue, and the 250 is teal.
One moving average gives you a level; three give you structure. When they're stacked in order — 100 on top of 200 on top of 250 — and price is above all three, the trend is clean and up (that's exactly the NuScale chart: price riding above a fanned-out stack). When they twist together and cross, the market is in chop and I stand down. The space between the fastest and slowest EMA is a dynamic support/resistance band — in an uptrend I want pullbacks to hold that band, not slice through it.
A moving-average cloud — a shaded band drawn between a fast and a slow average that changes color with the short-term trend. On the chart it's the blue shading when bullish and orange/red when it rolls over. It reacts much faster than the 100/200/250 EMAs, so it's my early read on momentum.
It's a filter, not a signal. Price riding above a bullish (blue) cloud is continuation, and the cloud edge acts as a moving support line — I trail behind it. When the cloud flips color, short-term momentum has turned; into a strong trend that's often just a pullback to buy, but against the EMAs it's my first warning to tighten up or step aside. I never take a flip alone — I want it agreeing with the trend and a zone.
A Fair Value Gap (FVG) is a three-candle imbalance. When one candle moves so hard that the wick of the candle before it and the wick of the candle after it don't overlap, it leaves a gap of price that never actually traded — an imbalance the market tends to come back and "fill." The "Auto Closest" part just means the indicator always plots the nearest unfilled gap to current price so you're not hunting for it.
BPR (Balanced Price Range) is the upgrade: when a bullish FVG and a bearish FVG overlap on the same prices, that shared zone is a higher-confluence reaction area — both sides left an imbalance there, so price tends to respect it harder than a lone gap.
The FVG is where I want the trade, not whether to take it. In an uptrend I let price pull back into the closest bullish gap and look for it to hold — gap + EMA band + bullish cloud lining up is a clean continuation entry, with my stop just past the far edge of the gap. A BPR zone gets more size because it's higher confluence. If price rips through a gap without reacting, that tells me the move has real force behind it and I don't fight it.
The Relative Strength Index — a momentum oscillator that measures how strong recent up-moves are versus down-moves on a 0–100 scale, over a 14-candle lookback. Above 70 is overbought, below 30 is oversold. The "Tops & Bottoms" version also marks swing highs and lows so divergences are easier to spot.
RSI is a context tool — never a standalone buy/sell. In a strong trend it can sit "overbought" for a long time, so I don't fade a print just because it's above 70. What I actually watch is divergence: price makes a higher high but RSI makes a lower high, and suddenly the new high isn't backed by momentum. Paired with a color flip on the cloud or a rejection at an FVG, that divergence is my cue that a move is running out of gas.
A heatmap that shades the chart by relative volume — instead of one plain volume bar per candle, it lights up the bars and zones where unusually heavy volume traded. The header on my chart (the 2.16M reading) is the current bar's volume; the shading tells me how that stacks up against the recent norm.
Volume is the honesty check on every other indicator. A breakout, an FVG fill, an EMA reclaim — all of it matters more when it happens on hot volume and less when the heatmap is cold. Heavy-volume zones tend to become future support and resistance because that's where real positions were built. My rule: a move on thin volume is a suggestion; a move on heavy volume is a decision. If price breaks a level but the heatmap stays cold, I treat it as a fake until volume shows up.
No single one of these gets me into a trade. The edge is confluence — waiting until several independent reads agree. Here's the order I run through, top-down:
When all five line up, it's a high-conviction setup and it gets full size. When four agree and one doesn't, it's smaller or a pass. When they're fighting each other, that is the signal — the market hasn't decided, so I don't have to either.
Three EMAs turn one line into a trend map. When price is above all three and they're stacked in order (100 over 200 over 250), the trend is clean and up; when they're tangled, it's chop and I stand down. The space between them also acts as a dynamic support-and-resistance band, so pullbacks into that band are where continuation trades set up. One MA gives you a level; three give you structure.
An FVG is a three-candle imbalance: a strong middle candle moves so fast that the wick of the candle before it and the wick of the candle after it don't overlap, leaving an untraded gap that price tends to return and fill. A BPR is where a bullish FVG and a bearish FVG overlap on the same prices — both sides left an imbalance there, so it's a stronger, higher-confluence reaction zone.
It's a moving-average cloud — a shaded band between a fast and a slow average — that changes color with the short-term trend. Price riding above a bullish cloud is continuation and the cloud acts as support; when it flips to a bearish color, momentum has turned. It's a fast trend-and-momentum filter that sits on top of the slower 100/200/250 EMAs, and I never trade a flip on its own.
It's the standard 14-period RSI with the usual 70/30 overbought and oversold bands, but it also marks swing tops and bottoms to make divergences easier to see — where price makes a new high or low but RSI doesn't. I use it for exhaustion and divergence, never as a standalone buy or sell signal. Overbought in a strong trend means strong, not done.
The [xdecow] heatmap shades the chart by relative volume, so bars and zones where unusually heavy volume traded light up. It answers where real size actually changed hands — those zones tend to act as future support and resistance, and a breakout on hot volume is far more trustworthy than the same move on thin volume.
No — and stacking indicators for the sake of it just creates noise. Each one here answers a single question (trend, momentum, zone, exhaustion, volume). The value isn't the count; it's that they're independent reads, so when they agree you have real confluence. Start with trend and volume, add the rest only once you know exactly what each one is telling you.
I run this exact chart in the free Discord and call the setups in real time — trend, zone, the flip, the volume confirm — before the trade, not after. 3,600 traders, wins and losses both on the board.
The top conviction names, the day's key levels and the heaviest options flow — free, every morning. No card, no Discord required.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Just the daily flow.